While reading I found myself very interested in the section about Affonso and his time while on the throne in Africa. What I liked in the reading about him was how it talked about him trying to end the slave trade. Something that I also thought was interesting was the Europeans vision Africa as whole before they began to have their own explorations there and it was all based on what other people has said. Ranulf Higden has done a map of the world and has said that Africa contained one eyed people who used their feet to protect their heads. The Europeans based their first impressions off of misconceptions. After Higden when other geographers explored that area more misconceptions came about. Europeans had no reason not to believe them so instead of looking for themselves they just trusted these geographers. But then in the fifteenth century when Europeans began leading their own explorations did they start to see that the country had many things for them to gain to help the Industrial Revolution.
I also like reading about Henry Morton Stanley. What I enjoyed most about reading about him was how his name changed many times before he settled on Henry Morton Stanley. He took on many identities based on were he was in his life and I liked how the book talked a lot about his travels and his explorations in Africa and in North America.
Open ended discussion questions:
1. Since there was not written language in the Congo when the Europeans arrive how were the events that happened recorded if they were by the people in Africa?
2. Who were some of the other people like Edmund Dene Morel besides George Washington Williams who tried to get the attention of the rest of the world about King Leopold's Congo and what actions were they taking?